This page provides Cenovus's view on current topics affecting our industry and how they shape the work we do. Hot topics related to the energy industry don't just affect the industry. They affect all Canadians. Topics like climate change, mandated production curtailments and new pipeline projects.
To share your perspective, contact us at email@example.com.
Last year, the federal government introduced Bill C-69, which includes some significant proposed changes to the review process for large Canadian resource projects, such as pipelines and mines.
The legislation opens the review process up to potential public policy debate over broad issues such as climate change and gender equity and includes numerous opportunities to greatly lengthen the legislated timelines for project approvals. As it’s currently written, the Bill will most likely make it even easier for opponents to delay important projects through court challenges.
Unless amended, the impact of Bill C-69 will be felt by all Canadians. The Bill will slow down an already complex review process and create even more uncertainty in the Canadian resource industry. This is not what Canada needs.
At Cenovus, we’re working with our industry peers to encourage the government to amend Bill C-69 to achieve a review process that is in the best interests of all Canadians.
To be clear, what industry is asking for is a science-based process that’s disciplined, objective, transparent and allows for meaningful participation of directly impacted stakeholders. A credible review process also needs to provide certainty to investors that decisions will be made within a reasonable timeframe, and that if a project proponent follows all the rules and meets the requirements, an approval will allow projects to move forward.
We’re asking for changes to the Bill to ensure that:
- the assessment process is sufficiently robust so that the courts are not frequently asked to reverse project approvals
- there is more certainty around review timelines
- there are clear rules that allow for public participation inclusive of Indigenous groups to ensure the Crown’s duty to consult is met through meaningful consultation
Bill C-69 has been through the House of Commons and is now with the Senate, where amendments are being considered before the Bill is returned to the House for final reading. It is critical that the Senate take the necessary steps to improve the Bill before it is passed into law.
Throughout 2018 the price differential between Western Canadian Select (WCS) oil and West Texas Intermediate was volatile, reaching record levels late in the year. The widening differentials*, and corresponding collapse in the price of WCS, were caused by Canada’s inability to get new pipelines built that are required to support Alberta’s growing oil production. In the latter half of 2018, production output exceeded takeaway capacity, leaving the industry in an unsustainable situation. This created a competitive issue for Alberta and for all of Canada and it threatened to be a crisis for the oil and gas industry in 2019. If left unchecked, one of the largest contributors to the Canadian economy would continue to receive virtually nothing for its product, impacting investment in the country, jobs, government revenues, taxes and much more.
On December 2, 2018, the Government of Alberta made the decision to curtail oil production by 325,000 barrels per day or 8.7%, starting January 1, 2019. We supported the government’s difficult decision and fully backed this temporary, short-term measure to relieve this extraordinary situation. This province-wide curtailment has helped bring production in line with takeaway capacity and reduced record-high oil storage levels that have directly contributed to wide differentials. It has also helped ensure that all Albertans will be able to benefit from the resources that they own through royalty payments to the provincial government.
Read our media statement in support of the Alberta Government’s decision (December 2, 2018).
*Differential is a term that refers to the difference in price between two different types of oil. In this instance, Canada’s heavy crude usually trades at a discount because of refining and transportation costs, so a price gap or differential is typical between West Texas Intermediate (WTI) and WCS. The difference is typically between $10-15 dollars a barrel but reached levels higher than $50 a barrel in November 2018.
In May 2016, the Government of Canada joined Alberta in announcing that it is adopting the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP).
The Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers has expressed its support for the adoption of UNDRIP in a way that is consistent with the Constitution and Canadian law, and Cenovus is fully aligned with that position.
We believe the declaration provides a framework for reconciliation in Canada and establishes an important set of standards to help ensure Indigenous rights are respected around the world. We also believe that meaningful consultation is at the heart of the declaration. By engaging in meaningful consultation, industry and Indigenous communities can better understand potential issues related to development and can work together to mitigate them even before projects begin.
At Cenovus, we have always strived to meet or exceed the requirements for consultation by engaging in respectful and ongoing discussions with our Aboriginal neighbours. Through this approach, we’ve built strong working relationships that have allowed us to complete decades-long community agreements with many of the Indigenous communities near our operations. These agreements provide funding that can be used for community enhancement, heritage projects and education and training to help community members participate in job opportunities. We also work to create business opportunities wherever possible. Since 2009, Cenovus has spent approximately $1.8 billion doing business with Aboriginal companies.
At Cenovus, our mission is to maximize the value of our company by responsibly developing oil and natural gas assets in a safe, innovative and efficient way. That includes finding the right balance between minimizing our environmental impacts and maximizing our efficiency so that we can remain both cost and carbon competitive. We believe that technology and innovation are key to reducing both costs and emissions. We recognize that there are growing concerns globally about the effects of climate change and that the transition to a lower-carbon economy is already underway.
To learn more about our work and the actions we’re taking to address climate change in our work, visit our climate change page.
We’re supportive of all projects that would open up access to new markets for our oil. Pipelines have proven to be the safest and most efficient means of moving oil from production fields to refineries. Of all the oil and refined products Canadian and U.S. pipeline companies transported between 2002 and 2016, 99.999 percent was transported safely1. Stringent monitoring is in place and helps to minimize the occurrence of an incident. Emergency response plans and procedures are also a critical component of safe pipeline operation. These plans allow pipeline operators to respond effectively and quickly to any emergency that could impact the public and the environment.
We believe expanding pipeline capacity is in the interest of all Canadians. Without access to new markets, Canada's oil industry will continue to receive a lower price for oil products because we're limited to primarily one customer - the United States. New pipelines that provide access to marine ports will create opportunities to sell our oil to new customers all around the world, which will benefit the entire Canadian economy.
We support new pipeline projects, including Kinder Morgan’s Trans Mountain Expansion pipeline to the West Coast, as well as TransCanada’s proposed Energy East pipeline to the East Coast. These projects will be state-of-the-art and use steel and anti-corrosion coatings. They will be among the strongest and safest pipelines ever built.